Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in...
by Yizahi on Thursday December 28, 2023 @05:48AM
(#38792120)
We can extend this analogy. What if someone put up a proxy, that has a legal Netflix subscription and which "watches" streams of Netflix shows, captures actual RGB values of pixels and re-streams the resulting video to anyone else? Isn't it the same "proxy" excuse?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NY Times copyright suit wants OpenAI to delete all GPT in...
by quickthrower2 on Thursday December 28, 2023 @06:31AM
(#38792393)
I would say no because the site was happy to serve the content publicly,
whereas your proxy is breaking a contractual agreement. Now we get into terms of service of a website, and even if you visit for free you agree to them. Which is a possible point. It is quite grey IMO. In terms of HN I reckon a mag would love the free brand rec. vs. the archive not being shared. Where it hurts them is if someone is avoiding paying for a subscription by continually using archive sites.