News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by passion__desire on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @01:25PM (#38784886)
You don't need Julia. Julia was trying to be a better python. We will have better python in form of Mojo.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by ubj on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @02:24PM (#38785518)
It should be fairly clear from studying the structure of Julia that it was never meant to be simply a better Python.

Mojo also owes part of its design from the lessons it took from Julia (as per Chris Lattner [1]).

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35791125

Re:Julia 1.10 Released by markkitti on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @05:09PM (#38787412)
After looking at Mojo, I appreciated all the paradigms that Julia was pushing forward even more than I did before. Mojo's greatest asset and curse is focusing on being a better Python. Julia's greatest asset and curse is trying to do a lot more.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by froonly on Thursday December 28, 2023 @11:49AM (#38795367)
Julia was meant to be a better Fortran/C++
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by FridgeSeal on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @01:34PM (#38784974)
Mojo is vapourware from a private company (and we all know how those turn out re programming languages) until proven otherwise.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by markkitti on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @03:42PM (#38786491)
I'm not sure that's a fair description at this point. They have distributed some SDKs at this point.

I really do wish it were open source already though. I know they have laid out a roadmap for opening the source.

Re:Julia 1.10 Released by FridgeSeal on Saturday December 30, 2023 @10:26AM (#38815938)
The person in charge of Mojo was previously in charge of a massive effort to give tensorflow a new backend, for which he conveniently picked Swift (a language he was also involved in), despite there being better options, only to abandon it halfway through because it was intractable and Swift wasn’t ready/willing to support the compiler changes needed, so he just abandoned it, and now works on Mojo.

It gives real “Jony Ive leaving Apple to go work somewhere where nobody can tell him ‘no’ “ vibes.

Re:Julia 1.10 Released by passion__desire on Sunday December 31, 2023 @08:25AM (#38823872)
You don't consider developing llvm as an accomplisment?
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by csjh on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @01:48PM (#38785132)
What other private company languages are there? Swift is the best example I can think of, which matches Mojo's situation down to the head of the project.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by sinkwool on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @04:01PM (#38786686)
aren't most languages invented and initially developed within a private company? Go, Dart, Java, JavaScript, C#, F#, VBA, Kotlin, Erlang, C(at AT&T), Rust (at Mozilla). The list is probably very long
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by notthemessiah on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @04:36PM (#38787049)
Most of those are open source, and while initially developed at a private company, most are run by non-profits (such as the Rust Foundation for Rust). Also, the language itself is not usually the main product at those companies.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by Conscat on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @03:09PM (#38786063)
K is one such language.
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by dist-epoch on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @03:44PM (#38786520)
Mathematica
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by ReleaseCandidat on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @02:05PM (#38785326)
IBM has some, ABAP, ...
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by akkad33 on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @05:54PM (#38787878)
Matlab
Re:Julia 1.10 Released by markkitti on Wednesday December 27, 2023 @06:06PM (#38787971)
MATLAB® by MathWorks