News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by cepacked on Monday December 25, 2023 @05:31AM (#38761446)
Does this mean more and more developers could easily make GTA like games now that they have access to this source code ?
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by brainzap on Monday December 25, 2023 @07:26AM (#38762058)
not by much, usually I review the data models to absorb their design and translate into lessons
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by mopsi on Monday December 25, 2023 @07:01AM (#38761916)
No. It's more like a writer describing their creative process. Knowing how someone else gathers ideas or structures text may help you improve your own writing, but that is still a very small part of publishing an original work.
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by tarruda on Monday December 25, 2023 @05:59AM (#38761581)
If they can extract the game engine code into a reusable framework, yes.

No game created from it could ever be legally released though.

Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by cepacked on Monday December 25, 2023 @06:19AM (#38761695)
If it's a closed source release, how could anyone prove which code/framework they reused ?
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by prometheon1 on Monday December 25, 2023 @06:35AM (#38761770)
I'd imagine a complex game engine has some bugs or weird behaviours in specific conditions. If it can be proven that the closed source game has a lot of the same bugs/behaviours, that is likely enough to win a lawsuit.
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by sweatypalmer on Monday December 25, 2023 @06:46AM (#38761830)
>Reverse engineers have entered the chat room.

Finding this would be pretty trivial depending on how much was stolen. And proving this would be more of a matter for Rockstar lawyers

Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by 93po on Monday December 25, 2023 @09:37AM (#38762912)
Decompile it and see things work exactly the way the original game does, bugs and all
Re:GTA 5 source code leaks online by jncfhnb on Monday December 25, 2023 @12:41PM (#38764454)
Can’t you decompile it?