Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's Censorship Demands

Re:Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's... by drowsspa on Sunday December 24, 2023 @10:17PM (#38759351)

"Factually wrong" oh yeah, I'm being factual and logical and those others are being ideological and political.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's... by Georgelemental on Sunday December 24, 2023 @10:53PM (#38759554)

Yes, this is in fact one of the few cases where a philosopical question has clear-cut, empirically verifiable right and wrong answers.

(Merry Christmas btw)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's... by drowsspa on Monday December 25, 2023 @07:00AM (#38761905)

Of course, like I said, libertarianism is empirically verifiably right. Got it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's... by Georgelemental on Monday December 25, 2023 @12:17PM (#38764294)

I don't consider myself a libertarian. "Food and shelter are limited resources" is empirically verifiable.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Rumble Turns Off Access in Brazil Because of Government's... by drowsspa on Tuesday December 26, 2023 @06:21AM (#38770794)

That is a fact. Where your ideology enters the argument is when you say that implies they're not human rights.

[ Parent | on HN ]