News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Children surrounded by chatty adults are themselves more ... by Der_Einzige on Sunday December 24, 2023 @05:37AM (#38752572)
This was not shallow. Dang yet again sucks all the air out of the virtual room with his terrible takes. Please go moderate actually important threads
Re:Children surrounded by chatty adults are themselves more ... by breezedream on Sunday December 24, 2023 @07:27AM (#38753029)
I think dang is right and his moderation is what keeps this place worth visiting. YMMV.
Re:Children surrounded by chatty adults are themselves more ... by wkipling on Sunday December 24, 2023 @06:29AM (#38752787)
I don't think it was shallow but it doesn't seem very well thought out
Re:Children surrounded by chatty adults are themselves more ... by mewpmewp2 on Sunday December 24, 2023 @06:37AM (#38752824)
It's a fair point on the title of the article.

Title is an obvious statement of fact that anyone would also just naturally expect, that either genes or nurture have correlation to where children have similar behaviour to their parents.

Within the article maybe what would have been more interesting statement and for the title is that "Global data set suggests socioeconomic status does not play a role in children’s language development".

Otherwise it reads like an onion article or something.

"Study shows that children's skin color correlates with their parent's skin color".