Re:AI companies required to disclose copyrighted training da...
by tomrod on Saturday December 23, 2023 @02:22PM
(#38747209)
I'm not sure how you inferred "metric" from my comment, only that Dan Brown's scaffolding was apparent when I read three or four of his novels in quick succession. Such patterns are equivalent to artists' signature techniques and lend themselves to transfer learning, like generating an image in the style of starry night. This is more one-shot examples versus measurement or a loss function.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI companies required to disclose copyrighted training da...
by jncfhnb on Saturday December 23, 2023 @03:11PM
(#38747706)
You said if one book enters public domain then every book effectively enters public domain from a plausible deniability angle of using the one relevant book. But that makes no sense at all. Because anyone can write a book in the style of Dan Brown without infringing on his IP. You don’t need Starry Night to teach a model to make works like Starry Night. You just need a work like Starry Night. And if you want to argue that the machine can learn style better than humans for text, then how is this ever going to hold up in court as “too similar to the style”?