Re:Tech Hubs Are Losing the Talent War to Everywhere Else
by pj_mukh on Saturday December 23, 2023 @01:49PM
(#38746858)
Headline literally has the word “losing” in it. Hehe. But because the data doesn’t bear that out gotta hedge bets in the article, as long as you’ve got the clicks.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tech Hubs Are Losing the Talent War to Everywhere Else
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday December 23, 2023 @01:53PM
(#38746914)
> Headline literally has the word “losing” in it
Losing market share threatens “hub” status. That doesn’t mean everyone is miserable. But there is a real story in the data someone who reads the article will glean.
> as long as you’ve got the clicks
The Journal makes money on subscriptions. You’re describing publications that cater to people who don’t pay for news and don’t read articles.
Re:Tech Hubs Are Losing the Talent War to Everywhere Else
by lotsofpulp on Saturday December 23, 2023 @02:04PM
(#38747035)
WSJ, like pretty much all media, earns money from both ads and subscriptions. They have ads in the middle of Apple News+ too. And I assume they get paid somehow for “submarine” or PR articles.
Re:Tech Hubs Are Losing the Talent War to Everywhere Else
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday December 23, 2023 @02:44PM
(#38747432)
> I assume they get paid somehow for “submarine” or PR articles
Submarines aren’t paid for directly, particularly not at reputable publications. They take advantage of journalists’ desire for convenience, not revenue.