Not an immutable distro though.
Snap might not be a part of systemd, but it is in the same general category of ultra standardized system software.
I'm not sure why there's no real FOSS alternative to it, but there was an attempt at one point. I've always thought it would be cool to make a torrent-based P2P snap store.
No it isn't. Canonical's snap store is closed source but Snap does not depend on it and the process of configuring snapd to fetch and install from your own store is fully documented and needs no proprietary or Canonical tech whatsoever.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/10/snap_without_ubuntu_t...
There are multiple links to Canonical docs, and I don't think it's worth trying to summarise it further.
It does have the "downside" of not just being plug-and-play but rather BYO system.
> CarbonOS is close, and GnomeOS too.
> and here, we build something generic to create images from Fedora/debian/suse/arch… distro packages:
> https://github.com/systemd/particleos
> There‘s a lot going on in the matrix channel of mkosi, I would recommend taking a look.
I have spent lots of time with Linux servers. I’m also very pragmatic. systemd has made lots of stuff easier, is highly configurable, maintained and regularly updated, and properly standardised. I acknowledge people who have a need to feel in control or something, but I just want reliable computers that have a single way of doing stuff. They’re cattle, after all.
So I’d really love something with an immutable system image, signed boot, and systemd services top to bottom, along the lines of the thought experiments in Poetterings blog. Is that a thing?