News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Advancements in machine learning for machine learning. Parent comment

Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by staunton on Saturday December 16, 2023 @05:42AM (#38663283)
Indeed, making poor people in 3rd world countries rate the worst sludge of the internet for 8+h a day might backfire on your marketing... OpenAI could risk it, Google maybe doesn't want to...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by blowski on Saturday December 16, 2023 @05:46AM (#38663301)
Given that many western companies hire poor people to do all sorts of horrible work I doubt it’s that. More likely it’s to avoid suggestions of bias across their product range.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by Palmik on Saturday December 16, 2023 @11:11AM (#38665273)
This is a naive take. How do you think Google collects or collected data for their safe-search classifiers? Now that's a sludge.

Or how do you think Google evaluates search-ranking changes (or gather data for training various ad-ranking & search-ranking models).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by staunton on Saturday December 16, 2023 @11:38AM (#38665529)
I don't know. How do they?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by pixl97 on Saturday December 16, 2023 @03:19PM (#38667336)
I was going to make a joke about all those CAPTCHAs we've solved, but I don't have an answer here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Advancements in machine learning for machine learning by NavinF on Saturday December 16, 2023 @03:33PM (#38667425)
Their instructions for human raters is public info.

Overview: https://blog.google/products/search/overview-our-rater-guide...

Full PDF: https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/guidelines.raterh...

[ Parent | on HN ]