Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was hugely influential. We...
by scotty79 on Friday December 15, 2023 @06:31AM
(#38653104)
"tough" and "firm" are dog whistles for multitude of pathological behaviors
Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was hugely influential. We...
by ethanbond on Friday December 15, 2023 @08:00AM
(#38653696)
They’re extremely mild implications of the exact shape you’d expect actual guards to get while on the job, no?
Is your thinking that a prison guard (or analogous) would be told to be kind and forgiving, or not given any direction at all on the “right” way to behave?
Re:The Stanford Prison Experiment was hugely influential. We...
by mc32 on Friday December 15, 2023 @07:53AM
(#38653642)
Nitpick: those might be euphemisms but they’re not dog whistles. Everyone, not just some kind of people would understand the unstated meaning of those words.
Dog whistles are similar to shibboleths.
--
My instructions to the guards, as documented by recordings of the guard orientation, were that they could not hit the prisoners but could create feelings of boredom, frustration, fear, and "a sense of powerlessness—that is, we have total power of the situation, and they have none." We did not give any formal or detailed instructions about how to be an effective guard.
Asking a person role-playing a guard in a prison simulation to be "firm" and "in the action" is mild compared to the pressure exerted by actual wardens and superior officers in real-life prison and military settings, where guards failing to participate fully can face disciplinary hearings, demotion, or dismissal. Although the research team asked all guards to be actively involved and firmly in control of the prisoners, it never instructed guards to employ brutality, and it explicitly banned the use of physical force.
--