Do either of them have the volume to supply the server market? At the end of the day that's why Intel is still relevant.
I figured intel is still "relevant" because of past momentum, not because of actual specs or production capacity.
So while AMD is relevant. Intel is only "relevant" with quotations.
There is enough demand for both TSMC and Intels capacity.
In terms of potential for future success and raw ranking, yeah intel is still relevant in this area. But given that most people on HN are consumers I would think "relevant" applies to my first statement. They aren't currently a rational choice when you are making a purchase decision. But I guess I'm wrong. People will buy a shittier product just out of patriotism I guess? Nothing wrong with that.
Yes. Having a lot of cash buys you exclusivity for TSMC 3nm and then for TSMC 2nm.