Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by BizarreByte on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @04:48PM
(#38619125)
> or where a market failure has failed to provide a decent equivalent
A whole lot of weird, or just simply old planes still operate in Canada for this reason. Until this year you could still find 737-200 flights in the north.
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by raverbashing on Wednesday December 13, 2023 @12:53AM
(#38623235)
It's the gravel kit
No other 737 got the gravel kit
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by hef19898 on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @01:22PM
(#38616179)
Or they are used as a basis for freighter conversions.
Not sure who still flys 757/767s so, at least for pax. Most shoupd have been replaced by 777/787/A350s by now.
Edit: Totally forgot about Delta.
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by sokoloff on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @02:00PM
(#38616716)
Delta operates nearly 200 of the 75s & 76s. (They are the largest operator of both, I'm pretty sure.)
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by weaksauce on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @03:13PM
(#38617745)
I flew on a 75 on delta the other day
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by awad on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @02:50PM
(#38617426)
Delta and United both do, with Delta being the largest operator of both types.
Re:Active turbulence cancellation makes bumpy flights 80% sm...
by bobthepanda on Tuesday December 12, 2023 @06:28PM
(#38620310)
there's not quite a plane on the market with the range and the lower capacity.
The old clunkers still around are mostly used in sanctioned countries, or where a market failure has failed to provide a decent equivalent (757/767)