They managed to put out the gold standard for 7B models in like 6 months, and are quickly moving up the scale.
I mocked the funding round back in March as being signs of hype, ($300m for a team of 3 with just an idea?) but clearly I didn't know the details. Really remarkable execution.
They may well be on their way to eat all use cases that don't need gpt-4 performance and hopefully soon tackle the big leagues as well. Exciting times!
LLMs are neat, but likely wont have a place in an AGI.
It's kind of hard to tell what it is from both the blog post and their homepage. So only people really familiar with AI will grasp the relevance. But your comment certainly helps.
Maybe in 1970 someone was arguing that Volvo is handicapped because Swedish safety regulations have become so stringent that their cars can’t compete on price elsewhere. Turns out it was exactly Volvo’s strength to be ahead of the curve on regulation.
[0]https://www.ft.com/content/9339d104-7b0c-42b8-9316-72226dd4e...
I've seen a few graphs showing staffing counts and budgets for US regulatory agencies have grown exponentially since the 1970s (adjusted for inflation), while it was relatively flat before then in the 60s. Economic regulation growth in the US has grown steadily while social regulations (workplace, climate, healthcare, transportation etc) grew dramatically. Adding in TSA / Homeland security and it's a hockey stick.
https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/za...
I'd be curious to see similar charts for the EU.
That's a weird analogy. I don't remember Volvo ever being that big. If anything they're bigger now than they used to be (I mean: I don't remember a world with lots of Volvo when I was a kid... I may be wrong though). And with about 650 000 vehicles sold per year they're not in the Top 25 car manufacturer worldwide by number of cars sold.
Also, I'm not sure how much the EU is really going to matter for the future of AI.
You don't really need to conform to their regressive tendencies if you don't want to do business with the EU. Or you could dumb your stuff down for them if it ever comes down to it.
Generally, it just wouldn't be worth it to care too much about what the EU thinks.
Mixtral of experts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38598559 - Dec 2023 (272 comments)
Mistral-8x7B-Chat - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38594578 - Dec 2023 (69 comments)
Mistral AI Valued at $2B - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38593616 - Dec 2023 (221 comments)
Mistral's mixtral-8x7B-32kseqlen on Vercel - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38584179 - Dec 2023 (30 comments)
French AI startup Mistral secures €2B valuation - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38580758 - Dec 2023 (76 comments)
Mistral "Mixtral" 8x7B 32k model [magnet] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38570537 - Dec 2023 (236 comments)
I know these are not all the same exact story but the discussions end up being more or less generically the same, so we can call them all (or most of them) quasidupes.
My argument is opening up the commercial offering is perhaps the biggest story yet simply because of all excitement this company has been able to generate.
This is a tiny company (appears 30 or so people?) that just scored a 2B valuation, produced easily the most performant 7B model and a 7B*8 MOE model that performs at the level of a 70B requiring the inference power of a 14B.
I feel this could be a potential bigger threat to OpenAI than Google or Anthropic. I gather with the huge recent investment they'll be able to a) scale out to a reasonable traffic load in the near future and b) attract the best and brightest researchers put off w/ various chest puffing and drama that has been front and center in this industry.