News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tech firms failing to 'walk the walk' on ethical AI, report says. Parent comment

Re:Tech firms failing to 'walk the walk' on ethical AI, repo... by fredgrott on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:48AM (#38592839)
that is about like saying the computer storing Osama Bin Laden's plans at his bunker makes the OEM that produced it liable....which is a BS argument for any general purpose tool in the world both now and in the future....

Can you make instead a strong argument?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tech firms failing to 'walk the walk' on ethical AI, repo... by uxp100 on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:59AM (#38592942)
No the poster is not saying that. They are saying there is a line and “tools” are on one side and LLMs are slowly crossing that line.

You can ask chatgpt about the reasons for 90s NATO expansion, and it remains pretty straightforward and fact based, but depending on how you push it you can get answers that reflect the dc consensus or sound a little leftist or are more realist, and it’s a political question how different facts should be presented and emphasized.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tech firms failing to 'walk the walk' on ethical AI, repo... by thfuran on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:57AM (#38592929)
No, it's like saying that the building plans supplier that sold Osama bin laden those plans is probably going to catch some flak.
[ Parent | on HN ]