News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by lvncelot on Sunday December 10, 2023 @10:24AM (#38592121)
This is what I've been wondering here, as well. So far, the downsides (Change to an almost subconscious muscle-memory-task, added friction) of this are pretty apparent - what even are the upsides of this?
Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by vcg3rd on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:13AM (#38592528)
I use Emacs, mostly for Org Mode, but not registers. I also understand perfectly the problem, and I also can't understand the upside.

The only clue I see is in the polite objection the author quotes who writes "I agree it's safer..."

But I don't understand safer in what way or why 1 person gets to decide safer=better=forced.

Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by rjzzleep on Sunday December 10, 2023 @10:32AM (#38592177)
Attracting new users for with the old behaviour is too complex maybe?
Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by samus on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:30AM (#38592679)
The new behavior doesn't make me want to invest effort in learning registers. A notification in the status bar which register just got filled would be all I want.
Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by mahkoh on Sunday December 10, 2023 @12:13PM (#38593060)
I believe Mozilla has been successful with a similar strategy.
Re:Bad NEWS, Emacs by dromtrund on Sunday December 10, 2023 @11:13AM (#38592521)
Isn't named registers an advanced enough feature that it shouldn't be optimized for new users?