News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by diob on Saturday December 09, 2023 @04:10PM (#38586129)
Basically all about having a homegrown solutions for South Korea, so the money flows there rather than an international corporation.

What will be interesting is if that homegrown solution is also used overseas, as then other countries will have to consider whether to retaliate with a similar "tax".

Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by konschubert on Saturday December 09, 2023 @04:19PM (#38586189)
You can have a homegrown solution but it won't have the content.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by cordellwren on Sunday December 17, 2023 @05:12PM (#38677001)
Most apps widely used in Korea are homegrown. They have enough content to dominate the market.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by viraptor on Saturday December 09, 2023 @05:14PM (#38586634)
Why do you think so? It sounds like this pricing structure applies to any company, local or foreign. Or an I mistaken here?
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by Scaevolus on Saturday December 09, 2023 @06:37PM (#38587374)
One of Korea's homegrown Twitch alternatives, AfreecaTV, uses AWS Cloudfront to serve video to users.

Amazon wins either way.

Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by duskwuff on Saturday December 09, 2023 @07:07PM (#38587567)
That can't be cheap. How are they making that work, from a financial perspective, when Twitch couldn't?
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by undersuit on Saturday December 09, 2023 @08:31PM (#38588137)
Because Amazon has no reason to risk Twitch profitablity. Twitch is not a profit maker it's a profit guarantee. Twitch doesn't need to compete with Kick or Afreekas. Amazon makes money.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by user_named on Saturday December 09, 2023 @09:24PM (#38588440)
You misunderstood the question
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by undersuit on Sunday December 10, 2023 @01:25AM (#38589592)
Amazon makes money whether it's their own Twitch or AfreecaTV using their servers.

AWS isn't closing down their Seoul data center, it's just letting AfreecaTV take the risk of streaming while still getting profits from said streaming.

Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by user_named on Sunday December 10, 2023 @02:14AM (#38589758)
You still don't get it
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by earthling8118 on Monday December 11, 2023 @10:07AM (#38601268)
And you're not helping them by vaguely saying their points have missed the mark.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by jmlim00 on Saturday December 09, 2023 @07:48PM (#38587857)
What I have heard was Afreeca makes use of distributed computing so that resources are shared directly between users rather than everything getting downloaded from their servers. This apparently cuts down on the amount of traffic load.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by riwsky on Sunday December 10, 2023 @09:14AM (#38591626)
They were comfortable risking user security by making everyone’s IPs visible to the other viewers (for P2P streaming); Twitch wasn’t.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by cordellwren on Saturday December 09, 2023 @09:56PM (#38588607)
Korean "homegrown" apps are usually more successful domestically. They don't need help from the government when US-based apps are years late to the game, not well localized, and not competitive feature-wise. The Youtubes and Instagrams that manage to penetrate the market are exceptions rather than the rule.
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by unsupp0rted on Sunday December 10, 2023 @04:38AM (#38590381)
Korean "homegrown" apps have incredible government support and/or come from one of 3 or 4 BigCo's
Re:Twitch can no longer afford to stay in South Korea by cordellwren on Sunday December 17, 2023 @05:11PM (#38676994)
You're plainly uninformed. The Korean equivalent of FAANG (네카라쿠배당토) are all completely different corporate entities, and the biggest apps outside of that are mostly startups. Also, what government support? Like specifically? Why on earth would you feel confident enough to make such claims when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about?