Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by paulsutter on Tuesday April 17, 2012 @05:27PM
(#3855078)
Thanks! I didn't realize that exchanges need to route orders to any other exchange with a better published price. That's a great rule. I assume that most ATS's are located within a short distance of each other.
Really helpful post. Thanks for the information.
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by nihilum on Wednesday April 18, 2012 @04:20AM
(#3857023)
> "I assume that most ATS's are located within a short distance of each other."
... if only. Reg NMS is a massive headache. This sort of price convergence would be better left to the arbitrageurs. Let the market deal with the light speed issues instead of trying to regulate physics.
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
by paulsutter on Wednesday April 18, 2012 @06:12PM
(#3860511)
Fascinating. Even more interesting. Thanks for the information.
There are also dark pools, whose innovation is that they don't display quotes. Every large brokerage has a dark pool. I wonder if there will be consolidation there; it's anyone's guess at this point.
As for network effects, Reg NMS requires an exchange to route an order to a rival if the rival has published a better price. So network effects are less important than you might think outside the dark pools. The features that really attract market makers are things like fees and likelihood of getting a fill (ie, priority rules).