Re:Governments spying on Apple, Google users through push no...
by eli on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @09:49AM
(#38544609)
That's awfully generous. He co-sponsored a bad law that he didn't actually want to see passed?
Re:Governments spying on Apple, Google users through push no...
by rchaud on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @10:51AM
(#38545451)
He may definitely want to see it passed. But elected officials should not be engaging in pushing bills that won't pass their first legal challenge.
Re:Governments spying on Apple, Google users through push no...
by eli on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @10:54AM
(#38545507)
Similar bills have already passed legal challenges https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/eighth-circuit-upholds-...
I think it's a bad law and he's making a big mistake. I'm still a fan though.
Re:Governments spying on Apple, Google users through push no...
by rchaud on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @01:52PM
(#38547996)
Thanks for the link. Scary to see that the state is re-drafting these laws specifically to find loopholes in the constitutional definitions of freedom of speech. Check out this other loophole:
> The act does not apply to contracts worth less than $1,000, or to companies that offer to provide the goods or services for at least 20 percent less than the lowest price quoted by a business that has complied with the certification requirement.
So, a contractor if free to boycott as long as they cost the taxpayer a little bit less.
Congress has been in a state of deadlock for too long to pass any actual laws, so this type of performative theater ahead of midterm elections is what passes for statesmanship.