Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by robertwt7 on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @02:21AM
(#38541278)
Although this is very exciting. Surely performance is not the benefit here? It won’t perform better than android app built not on top of the virtualisation tdchnology?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by omeid2 on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @02:42AM
(#38541374)
Android apps are already running on top of a Virtualisation Technology", both current ART (Android Runtime) and the previous one, Delvik, runtimes are virtual machines, process level virtual machines, but they do bytecode translation/JIT nonetheless.
If AVF allows running native code, it might actually be cheaper than the current arrangement.
Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by glacia01 on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @07:35AM
(#38543032)
I'm not Android expert in any way, but VM have nothing to do with virtualization. I think you're confusing something.
Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by fragmede on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @08:01AM
(#38543259)
what does VM stand for?
Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by walteweiss on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @07:50AM
(#38543164)
What do you mean?
Literally, the title: ‘Virtual Machine as a core Android Primitive’ and the very first sentence: ‘The Android Virtualization Framework (AVF) will be available on upcoming select Android 14 devices.’
Re:Virtual Machine as a Core Android Primitive
by IAmLiterallyAB on Wednesday December 06, 2023 @08:42AM
(#38543731)
Android apps can already run native code, so there's no performance benefit.
Also, Java "virtual machines" and native virtual machines are two very different things, they shouldn't be equated.