News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by stefcoetzee on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @04:40AM (#38528700)
What do you prefer?

(I quite like ClojureScript.)

Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by pocketsand on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @04:45AM (#38528750)
HTML, the language on the server
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by egeozcan on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @06:57AM (#38529769)
I'd always prefer React for when you have dedicated Front-end developers but for small go projects, gomponents with its htmx add-on does wonders.
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by treyd on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @06:24AM (#38529535)
We've been using the Dioxus library for Rust at my company and it's worked well. There's other Rust WASM web UI frameworks as well.
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by namtab00 on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @06:49AM (#38529714)
Blazor

yes, I am THAT guy...

Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by Alifatisk on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @05:02AM (#38528876)
Flutter
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by multiplegeorges on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @10:05AM (#38531748)
Uhhhh, HTML?
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by Scarbutt on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @10:30AM (#38532128)
That's worse than using plain JS.
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by stefcoetzee on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @12:09PM (#38533698)
How so?
Re:Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails by revscat on Tuesday December 05, 2023 @10:40AM (#38532277)
I prefer not to use JavaScript unless forced to do so. It's burdensome and almost always unnecessarily complicates the stack. With the rise of tools such as Turbo[1] and HTMX[2] the need for JS frameworks like React and Angular are greatly reduced, to the point that they are (almost?) unnecessary.

[1] https://turbo.hotwired.dev

[2] https://htmx.org