News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Investors snagged 1 in 5 homes for sale in Boston area, w... by theluketaylor on Monday December 04, 2023 @02:23PM (#38521832)
Some building code elements are absolutely critical, like the burn time required for external walls and then increasing it for shared walls. That absolutely saves lives and should be sacrosanct. Plenty of other code requirements are overly bureaucratic and do nothing but add expense, like ever decreasing maximum distance between outlets.

Zoning is the same way. Some of the rules are critical, but most are existing residents enforcing their preferences via bylaw. Ensuring adequate buffers between truly industrial uses and residential is a great use of zoning. Not being able to open low impact business like a barber shop or cafe in a residential neighbourhood makes absolutely no sense. Lot coverage percentages, parking minimums, height restrictions that don't allow gentle density, and exclusive single family zoning all need to go.

More than a century of code and zoning restriction have piled on each other over and over (with zoning often deeply rooted in racist policies). It's long past time to identify the safety critical ones and eject all the rest. It's true of zoning moreso than building code, but both could use a serious refactor.

Re:Investors snagged 1 in 5 homes for sale in Boston area, w... by quesera on Monday December 04, 2023 @06:48PM (#38524966)
Many of your "bad" examples have good justifications too.

You might not notice the value because the problems they were designed to prevent do not occur!

Exclusive SFH zoning is the least-frequently (but still not never) defensible, IMO. The others can be reasonable.