Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by caseymarquis on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:14PM
(#38503887)
I thought it was more like 2^23 unique prototypes?
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by darkerside on Saturday December 02, 2023 @07:36PM
(#38503674)
Four prototypes?
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by danwills on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:27PM
(#38503952)
Gamete cells get a random half of all genes from each parent so there's about 2 unique possible 'sets' from each parent, and 2*2=4. However because it's random I think you can only say there are 4 distinct completely unique possibilities in theory, but it would be very unlikely for that to actually happen in practice.
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by darkerside on Saturday December 02, 2023 @10:06PM
(#38504437)
Ahh, as in fully exclusive sets of genes
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by diroussel on Sunday December 03, 2023 @03:06PM
(#38510270)
Each parent supplies half the genetic material. But each sperm and each egg have a randomly different set of one half of each chromosomes.
So if you have 10 children chances are they each have a unique set of chromosomes.
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by rand0mx1 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @09:44PM
(#38504322)
Probably genotype. Isn't it
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by fsckboy on Saturday December 02, 2023 @09:55PM
(#38504372)
>Four prototypes?
gp said four unique prototypes
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by harry_ord on Sunday December 03, 2023 @02:24AM
(#38505488)
> But it's possible for siblings not to share any genetic material right?
Kinda but the mother always provides the mitochondria.
Re:Singing to babies is vital to help them learn language, s...
by CSMastermind on Sunday December 03, 2023 @03:37AM
(#38505728)
I think that's an area of open research: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1810946115
But yes, that's a good distinction I should have made!
That made me chuckle.
But it's possible for siblings not to share any genetic material right?
A brother and a sister would obviously get different genes from their father and presumably there would be a 50/50 chance of them getting different genes from their mother.
There's four unique prototypes of children any two people can produce together.