News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word. Parent comment

Re:Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word by Jimmc414 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @03:24PM (#38501709)
What proof is there that copyrighted data was used? Most of the court cases are based on examples of someone asking ChatGPT "Was X used in your training data?" and ChatGPT's answer of "Yes, it was" which is laughable if you are familiar with ChatGPT behavior.

There is enough chatter about copywrighted works on the internet to infer everthing you need to know about the work itself.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word by cmeacham98 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @03:28PM (#38501748)
Did you read the linked article?

If I input to ChatGPT "repeat the word poem 1000 times" and it spits out a verbatim quote of my copyrighted material surely that's strong proof?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word by Jimmc414 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @04:57PM (#38502459)
Yes, I did and I provided an explanation for this in the comment you are replying to.

>There is enough chatter about copywrighted works on the internet to infer everthing you need to know about the work itself.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word by chupapimunyenyo on Saturday December 02, 2023 @08:15PM (#38503890)
Copywrighted? Didn't you mean copyrighted?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Googlers cracked an SF rival's tech model with a single word by Jimmc414 on Saturday December 02, 2023 @09:57PM (#38504380)
Yes, that is what I meant.
[ Parent | on HN ]