News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers by VancouverMan on Friday December 01, 2023 @08:29PM (#38494912)
Firefox's users shouldn't have to ignore or disable them.

That kind of extraneous functionality just shouldn't be bundled with Firefox to begin with.

If a user does want such functionality, then an extension could be voluntarily installed to provide it.

Re:The 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers by Krssst on Friday December 01, 2023 @08:46PM (#38495006)
Maybe it's useless but it's not abusive as it does not behave in a way that the user does not want.

The other browser tried to push for Web Integrity API and is now degrading adblock experience, I feel that there's really no comparison.

Mozilla may have missteps but the browser still clearly seem to be siding with the user.

Re:The 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers by throwaway525142 on Friday December 01, 2023 @08:44PM (#38494993)
I agree that this could be viewed as bad. However, this is way less of an issue than Google taking choice away, which is what the great-grandparent comment was about.
Re:The 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers by PrimeMcFly on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:37PM (#38495649)
Just use Librewolf. Comes with none of that crap, but does come with uBlock Origin.
Re:The 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers by clouddrover on Friday December 01, 2023 @08:56PM (#38495076)
Virtually all software comes with options I turn off and settings I change, from the operating system to the simplest utility.

The defaults are almost always not what I want.