Advent of Code 2023 is nigh

Re:Advent of Code 2023 is nigh by messe on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:22PM (#38491000)

Yeah, all the talk of replacement seems like people masively overthinking or abstracting a day one problem. My C++ solution was a simple search using the <algorithm> header. It's a little less neatly abstracted out as yours, and could be cleaned up a fair bit, as I wasn't bothered to deduplicate the code after getting it working (and I will if this turns out to be useful tomorrow), but the essence is the same:

https://gist.github.com/joedavis/3d6f2b87bae4809ef8a062caff7...

C++'s .rbegin() / .rend() reverse iterators made the search fairly trivial.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Advent of Code 2023 is nigh by matsemann on Friday December 01, 2023 @02:42PM (#38491252)

I disagree on it being "overthinking". I just did replacement without really thinking. Saw that it failed on the "eightwo" case since "two" got replaced first, so just replaced "two" with "two2two" instead, then passed it through solver for part1. To me that's simpler and more naive than correctly writing a search or backwards-forwards regex :)

My solution in Kotlin https://github.com/kolonialno/adventofcode/commit/686cbebb07...

[ Parent | on HN ]