News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by Filligree on Friday December 01, 2023 @10:19AM (#38487711)
Speaking for myself, I’m getting the hang of training people remotely. It takes more structure, and it took a year to learn how, but it’s totally doable.
Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by duckmysick on Friday December 01, 2023 @11:02AM (#38488227)
Can you share what worked and what didn't when it comes to training people remotely?
Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by Filligree on Friday December 01, 2023 @01:42PM (#38490533)
Checklists are the big one. We've got a big spreadsheet of general areas that people should know, each with a lecture attached, but those are for self-study; I go over each one in detail with each new hire in a series of sessions typically lasting ~3 months, at 2-3 sessions per week.

Separately, I hold what amounts to office hours 3 times per week, where anyone who feels like it can show up to ask questions—but new hires are encouraged to do so until absolutely certain they don't need to, and also to keep track of questions between sessions.

There's more, but this is the part that's easy to explain.

What didn't work... crucially, waiting for newbies to ask questions doesn't work; they won't. You need to actively go looking, and also bring up areas they might not even know they ought to ask about.

Re:Return to office is 'dead,' Stanford economist says by duckmysick on Saturday December 02, 2023 @04:40AM (#38497383)
Thanks for the answer. I see the theme is you have to be proactive instead of passively dump info hope for the best. It makes total sense.