Re:I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was see...
by psunavy03 on Thursday November 30, 2023 @10:56AM
(#38475036)
> "I need to hire people I don't want to work with, so I have someone to fire in the next stack rank". And that's its own form of fat.
There's a great long-form article on this called "Microsoft's Lost Decade."
Re:I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was see...
by steveBK123 on Thursday November 30, 2023 @12:03PM
(#38475904)
Jack Welch also mostly made his mark by juicing earnings via both financializing the whole company going into the GFC, and by doing various forms of (probably illegal then, definitely now) accounting tricks to smooth earnings to always make his number.
GE was run into the ground by his tenure.
Re:I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was see...
by twiddling on Thursday November 30, 2023 @03:50PM
(#38478870)
This. GE Financial was an earnings laundering operation
Re:I worked in Amazon HR and was disgusted at what I was see...
by therealdrag0 on Sunday December 03, 2023 @02:00PM
(#38509715)
Isn’t that just a tuning problem? If the required fire % is low enough relative to hiring rate then people won’t hire to fire.
Long term, it has been a disaster in every company. Because eventually you run out of fat, and then what you describe as "far more willing to hire non-standard candidates on gut and hunches, knowing that if it didn't work out, it didn't work out they would be gone" becomes "I need to hire people I don't want to work with, so I have someone to fire in the next stack rank". And that's its own form of fat.
In short, stack ranking makes some sense if you have a fat organization, not unlike restricting calories to lose fat when working out. But once you've lost fat, continuing to restrict your calories results in losing more muscle than fat.