Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board

Re:Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board by djbusby on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:03PM (#38468944)

These internal drama can play out in the service. Frame the question as: do you want to build on an unstable/unsteady platform?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board by aantix on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:55PM (#38469387)

Do you want to build on subpar technology?

Nothing beats OpenAI at the moment. Nothing is even close.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board by quickthrower2 on Thursday November 30, 2023 @06:35AM (#38472267)

Phind is an example where they use their own model and it is pretty good at it’s specialty. OpenAI is hard to beat “in general” and especially if you don’t want to fine tune etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board by toomuchtodo on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:15PM (#38469056)

As long as you can outrun the technical debt, sure. Nothing lasts forever. Architect against lock in. This is just good vendor/third party risk management. Avoid paralysis, otherwise nothing gets built.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sam Altman returns as CEO, OpenAI has a new initial board by osigurdson on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @10:38PM (#38469265)

I'm convinced embeddings are the ultimate vendor lock in of our time.

[ Parent | on HN ]