News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In. Parent comment

Re:Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In by gitaarik on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:48PM (#38465096)
That is a slight layer upon simple JavaScript string templates, nothing compared to JSX I would say

Edit: hint: that is why Lit's library is also much smaller

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In by troupo on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @04:23PM (#38465516)
I: list all the custom things that lit has

I: ask to show me how converting from lit to something else is easier as you claim

You: ignore everything completely and answer a question literally no on asked, and pretend that the only custom thing is the DSL.

Yup. My choice to completely ignore you in a sibling discussion was correct.

On the other hand, after a few years of engaging with web component defenders, propoenents and propagandists I'm not surprised in the least. This behaviour is on par with the rest of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In by gitaarik on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @04:45PM (#38465754)
From all our arguments I think it's obvious that Lit has less lock-in than any other framework we discussed. If you find it so important to prove your point, why don't you make an exstensive comparison of all the discussed frameworks?
[ Parent | on HN ]