Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by izzydata on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @02:30PM
(#38464060)
The thing that existed before planes. Boats and trains.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by iancmceachern on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @02:54PM
(#38464374)
Those burn the same fuel...
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by izzydata on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:27PM
(#38464817)
Boats aren't constrained by weight like planes are. You could put any amount of batteries on a boat and get it to float and move on water. They can also be moved by wind. I may be wrong, but I also thought there existed some nuclear powered boats.
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by iancmceachern on Thursday November 30, 2023 @12:42PM
(#38476435)
Boats are very much so.
The largest container ships consume 250 tons of heavy fuel oil per day, they haul up to 15k containers and are at sea for months.
Filling a ship with enough battery power to replace that isn't remotely feasible. Just charging it at port would be an insane undertaking.
It's a truly crazy amount of energy.
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by Rebelgecko on Thursday November 30, 2023 @02:26PM
(#38477947)
We've had nuclear powered ships for 50+ years (even some civilians ones!). It seems like the problem is making them commercially viable. Maybe they would be if their competitors had to pay for the negative externalities of burning 250 tons of fuel per day?
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by nicoburns on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:06PM
(#38464548)
Boats do, but trains are mostly electric.
Re:Rolls-Royce calls off bets on electric planes, says low-c...
by iancmceachern on Wednesday November 29, 2023 @03:24PM
(#38464760)
Not in the US, their mostly diesel here