Tesla Cybertruck payload capacity 29% less than promised

Re:Tesla Cybertruck payload capacity 29% less than promised by r00fus on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @02:31PM (#38450104)

> It's not really a truck though, nor do I consider the f150-lightning a truck.

This sounds a lot like the classic "no true scotsman" fallacy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla Cybertruck payload capacity 29% less than promised by theultdev on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @02:34PM (#38450141)

Not really, as I outline what I need in a truck.

I don't mind if things are done other ways, as long as they are practical.

No purity test needed, just practicality.

Currently EV trucks are impractical outside of using them in town / on highways and they are not practical to haul range-wise.

If you don't need that stuff, what's the point over getting a car?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla Cybertruck payload capacity 29% less than promised by r00fus on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @07:43PM (#38453886)

But you specifically say "they're not really trucks" - that's not saying they're not useful trucks for you, but that you think they're not even in the same category.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla Cybertruck payload capacity 29% less than promised by theultdev on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @10:31PM (#38455165)

I said in my original post I will be the owner of a CyberTruck soon. It will be useful to me, to replace my car.

But since they only work well for in town and on highways, they don't work well to replace my truck for ranch and recreational off-roading use.

These categories are based on my own needs, but they aren't that unique.

[ Parent | on HN ]