Re:Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
by troupo on Monday November 27, 2023 @11:53PM
(#38442462)
> you're just being semantic for the sake of it a bit.
No. I'm calling it as it is. I don't pretend that something isn't a framework when it has all the same things that the frameworks they so love to vilify do.
> The Lit team are huge advocates of aligning with native standards
Which of the things that lit provides are native standards current or future? Its template DSL? Its custom decorators? Its data binding system? Tasks? Directives?
No. I'm calling it as it is. I don't pretend that something isn't a framework when it has all the same things that the frameworks they so love to vilify do.
> The Lit team are huge advocates of aligning with native standards
Which of the things that lit provides are native standards current or future? Its template DSL? Its custom decorators? Its data binding system? Tasks? Directives?
Not to mention the usual workarounds like support for SVGs https://lit.dev/docs/api/templates/#svg