But, more importantly, PostNord isn't doing anything - it's a unionised group of workers refusing to deliver Tesla products. That's how strikes work, and Musk's go-to course of action is to immediately proceed to legal action rather than negotiating and meeting the union's requirements.

How does a private company get the benefits of being legally required? That seems like a benefit that only a public company should have.

Tesla is required by law to use the post to get plates. This invalidates the whole premise.

If Tesla agreed (like 99,9999% of companies) with the democratically designed collective agreement, there would be no targeted strike. Strikes are one of the main democratic bargaining tool employees and unions have... including on key point of businesses.

Then why in this case are they violating consensuality and trying to impose the collective agreement on the Tesla worker pool from outside?

It effectively creates a powerful voice of literally everyday people who are working.

Solidarity strikes is the real power of worker unions.

Then why don't they have the backs of the majority of Tesla workers who didn't want the agreement? Are some workers more equal than others?