News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by dataking on Friday November 24, 2023 @05:45PM (#38409213)
A reasonable concern here is that power is transfered from subject matter experts to technocrats with a poor track record of making technical decisions. Some recent examples of EU tech debacles include Quaero, Galileo, Gaia-X, Ariane 6.
Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by SiempreViernes on Friday November 24, 2023 @06:21PM (#38409487)
On the other hand, the technocrats are beholden to actual elected officials, instead of the current situation where a group of random people selected by private companies coordinate their work by consensus without much formal structure and the members are beholden to nobody by their company boss.
Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by AnthonyMouse on Friday November 24, 2023 @10:20PM (#38410890)
Rule by consensus is basically democracy by whoever is motivated enough to show up. It seems to have an extremely good track record, especially compared with rule by central bureaucracy.

The exception is if the consensus is only among a small handful of large corporations that lack competition and then become the unaccountable technocrats. But in that case what you want from governments is not to take over as the malevolent bureaucracy, it's antitrust enforcement.

Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by negidius on Saturday November 25, 2023 @07:04AM (#38413007)
And those elected officials are beholden to the highest bidder. In the current system, the people who make CA decisions acquired that power voluntarily and seem to have acted benevolently in the past, that's way more than you can say about government officials.

The current voluntary system is also very open, and anyone can get involved and participate to a much larger extent than people realistically can in an electoral democracy. To me, the voluntary system seems to be better and safer for everyone who doesn't have a very large amount of money to throw at elections.

Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by izacus on Saturday November 25, 2023 @03:52AM (#38412237)
And big EU tech successes like GDPR, DMA and many others. What's your point?

This is about identity regulation, not random rockets.

Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by negidius on Saturday November 25, 2023 @07:06AM (#38413015)
I certainly wouldn't call those successes.
Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by throwaway473825 on Saturday November 25, 2023 @05:34AM (#38412630)
What's your concern with Galileo? Many experts consider it to be the best GNSS currently available:[1]

> The US constellation isn’t as accurate as the newer networks, said Roberts, the Sydney-based professor. “It used to be GPS was out in front,” he said. Now, though, the EU’s Galileo is in the lead, with China’s BeiDou close behind, he said.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-20/russia-s-...

Re:Some observations on the final text of the European Digit... by dataking on Tuesday November 28, 2023 @04:19AM (#38443939)
Thanks for backing up your point with a link. I agree that Galileo is more accurate than the much older GPS system. On the other hand, the GPS system became fully operational in 1995 as far as I understand, and the Galileo system is yet to be fully operational almost a decade after the original target date.