News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Failed Commodification of Technical Work by bryanrasmussen on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:10AM (#38405352)
>The whole point of...

there are many things that in theory have a particular point but that when put in practice most often do not have any point at all - in such cases opinion seems to divide between those who complain that the people who put things in practice do so incorrectly and those who feel that if the practice when implemented tends to be wrong then it is the fault of the theory itself.

I personally hold with the latter view.

Re:The Failed Commodification of Technical Work by marcosdumay on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:33AM (#38405631)
About sprint reviews in particular (not retrospective), do have a point in theory? I have never found anybody that can point to any.

AFAIK, everybody that do it is cargo-culting.

Re:The Failed Commodification of Technical Work by happymellon on Friday November 24, 2023 @11:21AM (#38405499)
The theory of identifying something as being shit and then removing it is a bad thing?
Re:The Failed Commodification of Technical Work by bryanrasmussen on Friday November 24, 2023 @12:41PM (#38406290)
That is not the theory, that is the goal. Sprint reviews have a goal of identifying something as being shit and then removing it, they have a theory as to how this will be achieved which is the sprint review process.