News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Is AI safety simply the thought police? by mcphage on Thursday November 23, 2023 @08:39AM (#38392608)
Well, you do need to get licensed to be a driver, and register your vehicle with the government, and you get fined—or worse—if you don’t operate it properly and safely.

So is what you’re asking for? That level of security around AI usage?

Re:Ask HN: Is AI safety simply the thought police? by ultrarunner on Thursday November 23, 2023 @11:33AM (#38394531)
Let's be honest, though: these are mostly just a grift. People kill other people in vehicles every single day. It's almost always referred to as an "accident", given nearly zero investigation, and there are zero consequences. The licensing & registration is mostly about paying a fee in many areas (and being taxed on the same thing over and over) and the last fee I paid for not "operating it properly" was along with 5 other people with out-of-state plates in a shakedown where the traffic light wouldn't change.

Arguing that these things are primarily in the interest of safety is tenuous at best. A fitting parallel for the levels of risk that chatbots present.

Re:Ask HN: Is AI safety simply the thought police? by mcphage on Thursday November 23, 2023 @12:56PM (#38395453)
Is there grift involved? Sure. Would we be better off or safer without the regulations? Hell no.