Reflecting on 18 Years at Google

Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by 121789 on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @04:06PM (#38385102)

I think this is why these teams are really hard to have in a mature org. In reality maybe 5% of projects in one of these innovation orgs is actually great! But it’s impossible to evaluate and everyone else is thinking some variant of “this team is able to bs and show no value, while I have to hit real goals or risk being fired?”

I think the incentives would have to be much different for it to work (e.g. much lower base pay + higher rewards for success)…..but at that point just join a startup

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by seraphsf on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @05:28PM (#38386073)

Which 5% of projects are really great? In my experience, presuming you have tight filters such that all of your projects are plausibly potentially great, you really don’t know until you try. That’s the point of an incubator.

It’s not that hard to evaluate when something is working (ie the hard part in evaluation is false negatives, not false positives).

In Area 120’s case there was no coasting - if anything there was a hair-trigger standard to shut down underperforming projects.

[ Parent | on HN ]