News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by js4ever on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @01:40PM (#38383255)
That's probably less than 1% of YouTube revenue (number came out of my hat)
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by JohnFen on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @02:03PM (#38383592)
In 2022, premium subscribers accounted for a bit less than 9% of YouTube's audience (and 67% of premium subscribers were in the US), according to this:

https://www.mediagistic.com/blog/how-many-youtube-users-will...

Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by jonathankoren on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @02:57PM (#38384292)
To use a googlism: I’m surprised Google can count that low.
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by kmlevitt on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @04:44PM (#38385575)
8-9% is actually a pretty impressive conversion rate considering close to 100% of people use YouTube. They have like 97.6% market share.
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by hot_gril on Thursday November 23, 2023 @02:15AM (#38390257)
No data for this, but I feel like 9% is less than they expected after 5 years of the "frustrate and seduce" strategy, which is why they're even going after ad-blockers now. If anything, they look frustrated. But they probably had to do this.
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by emodendroket on Thursday November 23, 2023 @10:46AM (#38393997)
Why would they want people using an ad blocker to even use the site that much though. They’re denying them revenue while costing them. I mean it’s great as a user but as a service there’s not really much upside.
Re:Reflecting on 18 Years at Google by hot_gril on Thursday November 23, 2023 @07:00PM (#38399216)
YouTube didn't seem to mind so much before. Maybe they wanted to keep those users' attention on YouTube instead of elsewhere. Now they're a lot more focused on the profits, which is fine.