Margaret Mead, Technocracy, and the origins of AI's ideological divide

Re:Margaret Mead, Technocracy, and the origins of AI's ideol... by TeMPOraL on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @03:22AM (#38376501)

If you say you can use fancy maths to make tanks roll faster off the assembly lines, or guide an ICBM towards Moscow/Washington, then the regime will happily support you. But if you get in your head that you can apply the same fancy math to run the economy, the regime will object - obviously - and label you as too communist/not communist enough, and persecute you/ship you off to a gulag.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Margaret Mead, Technocracy, and the origins of AI's ideol... by throwawayqqq11 on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @07:37AM (#38378385)

I dont understand why you get down voted. Economics are ultimately about physical power and any new emerging model is a thread to the dominant power structure aka the current model.

The conflicting models were the origin of the cold war (capitalism vs communism) and today between china and the west.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Margaret Mead, Technocracy, and the origins of AI's ideol... by brutusborn on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @12:24PM (#38382093)

Isn’t China essentially capitalist now? The main difference in my mind is authoritarianism vs liberalism.

[ Parent | on HN ]