Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by hintymad on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @01:36AM
(#38375571)
I think the difference is this: if a tech exec thinks something is good for the humanity and releases it as a product, I can choose not to use it. On the other hand, if Toner kills OpenAI because she thinks AI is dangerous, I won't be able to use OpenAI's product any more. And of course, I don't think someone who does not work on tech or STEM in general can have any insights on machine learning.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by dkjaudyeqooe on Wednesday November 22, 2023 @01:48AM
(#38375685)
But that's how OpenAI is set up. As director she is bound by the charter which she arguably is carrying out in good faith, as she has a fiduciary obligation to do.
So why are you mad at her? Altman was a founder and he set it up this way. Why aren't you pissed off at him?