Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and feuding

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by kragen on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @09:47PM (#38374068)

i read through most of moldbug's blog, and also knew his name and rhetorical style from crooked timber comments. possibly he was less racist than his followers? or just more circumspect about it. in any case, he attempted to justify his anti-liberal philosophy, at quite extreme length, but never on the basis of racism; so if racism was a core belief of his neoreactionary thought, it was apparently at a subconscious level

i remained unpersuaded in any case, steadfastly liberal

also, much to my surprise, he and i were both members of the first coworking space at spiral muse house in san francisco in 02006. but i didn't go very often, so i don't know if i ever met him; in any case that was before he revealed his identity

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by db-interface on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @10:09PM (#38374254)

I guess I am much less familiar with Moldbug's stated views than you, so I'm happy to concede that point.

Anyway, I think the HBD/NRx relationship is peripheral to the discussion of the Metz article -- I just framed it that way because that's the context of Scott's emails (certainly he think's they're at least associated!). The discourse around the Metz article was that it framed Scott as holding racist views, not specifically NRx views.

If I had mentioned Steve Sailer instead of NRx, would you agree that Scott was more sympathetic to those views than he publicly let on?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe... by kragen on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @10:25PM (#38374380)

yes

[ Parent | on HN ]