Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by alvah on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @08:26PM
(#38373361)
I don't know nearly enough about the OpenAI situation to suggest what she should have done (apart from "not help to press the self-destruct button," with the benefit of hindsight). However, I've read a bit about EA since the SBF debacle, and a childlike naivete does seem to be baked into the DNA of many of its followers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by 0xDEAFBEAD on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @08:42PM
(#38373496)
You would prefer that $billions be managed by the same snakes in suits who destroy the environment, market products that give people lung cancer, etc.?
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by alvah on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @11:08PM
(#38374642)
You’re going to have to show me where I said that champ
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by jxi on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @09:58PM
(#38374172)
Is that worse than people who defraud and steal from users and hold entire companies hostage for their own motives?
In EA, the ends always justify the means, so that includes doing any or all of the things you mention if it achieves some ideological goal.
Re:Before Altman’s ouster, OpenAI’s board was divided and fe...
by 0xDEAFBEAD on Tuesday November 21, 2023 @10:16PM
(#38374306)
SBF was roundly criticized in EA. The most upvoted post of all time on the EA forum is a post denouncing him: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/allPosts?timeframe=allTi...
The only person I've seen advocate "ends justify the means" in this discussion is someone criticizing Toner: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38373319