Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by voisin on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:16PM
(#38357479)
Reminds me of the final season of Silicon Valley. Is this Pied Piper at Tres Comma Fest?
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by satvikpendem on Monday November 20, 2023 @08:38PM
(#38357679)
Seems to me more analogous to the final episode of the final season, where they must publicly destroy what they built.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by jtriangle on Monday November 20, 2023 @10:41PM
(#38358827)
Yes, except what they think they've built is far far less capable than what they've actually built.
This is a ten year old who set off their first fire cracker turning to their parents's iphone and saying 'I have become death, destroyer of worlds', because they don't really understand how any of this works but they've somehow ended up in control of it and are now terrified of doing their jobs.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by voisin on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:17PM
(#38358081)
lol yes, I just refreshed the timeline which was skewed in my memory.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by paulddraper on Monday November 20, 2023 @09:03PM
(#38357943)
Life imitates art.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by aeonik on Monday November 20, 2023 @07:58PM
(#38357306)
Depending on the circumstances this statement can be perfectly logical.
But as far as I can tell, circumstances are still scant.
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by Davidzheng on Monday November 20, 2023 @10:11PM
(#38358580)
This could be a genuine stance for them if they are really in the AI danger camp. Not supporting the stance; but i think it's not a self contradictory position
Re:OpenAI's employees were given two explanations for why Sa...
by lolinder on Monday November 20, 2023 @11:08PM
(#38359067)
Oh, definitely not self-contradictory!
In retrospect it's a mistaken position, because it's pretty obvious now that if OpenAI disintegrates it will be as an exodus to Microsoft, which will undoubtedly be a worse steward, but I think it's an ethically consistent position to hold, in a naive sort of way. That's part of why I believe they actually said something like this.
> You also informed the leadership team that allowing the company to be destroyed “would be consistent with the mission.”