attention layer: core of transformer, was invented outside of Google.
Re:Google is not a tech company
by user_named on Saturday November 18, 2023 @11:22PM
(#38328911)
I thought that was pioneered in the paper that came out of Google?
Attention was first proposed in this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.0473.pdf and it is referenced from transformer paper.
Re:Google is not a tech company
by VeejayRampay on Monday November 20, 2023 @03:57AM
(#38345062)
at this rate no one ever invents anything cause everything is built on math
that some of the elements came out of somewhere else doesn't change the fact that Google came up with an impressive and game-changing piece of tech
It was not impressive at that time, because didn't achieve any quality breakthroughs. Later adapters of transformers like GPT and Bert achieved it with impressive results.
Re:Google is not a tech company
by rusticpenn on Sunday November 19, 2023 @02:55PM
(#38337128)
The LLM revolution can be traced back to a 1996 paper from AT&T
Re:Google is not a tech company
by VeejayRampay on Monday November 20, 2023 @03:44AM
(#38344890)
you always build on top of something else and I'm not saying otherwise
fact still remains that Google came up with an impressive and transformative piece of technology
Re:Google is not a tech company
by rusticpenn on Monday November 20, 2023 @01:39PM
(#38352346)
The groundbreaking paper from 96 did not lead to immediate advances because of the absence of computational power. This was then used by Hunton for the speech recognition paper which created the deep neural network revolution providing funding to create the transformers.
talk all you want about it's an ad company and da did da, in the end the whole LLM revolution is built on their tech