News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by ben_w on Saturday November 18, 2023 @04:19AM (#38317296)
It can do: https://chat.openai.com/share/f1c0726f-294d-447d-a3b3-f664dc...

IMO the main reason it's distinguishable is because it keeps explicitly telling you it's an AI.

Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by rezonant on Saturday November 18, 2023 @04:28AM (#38317368)
This isn't the same thing. This is a commanded recital of a lack of capability, not that its confidence in it's answer is low. For a type of question the GPT _could_ answer, most of the time it _will_ answer, regardless of accuracy
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by NoOn3 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @04:34AM (#38317404)
I just noticed that when I ask difficult technical questions, but for which there is an exact answer, he often tries to answer plausibly, but incorrectly instead of answering "I don't know".
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by ben_w on Saturday November 18, 2023 @04:37AM (#38317423)
Have you tried setting a custom instruction in settings? I find that setting helps, albeit with weaker impact than the prompt itself.
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by NoOn3 on Saturday November 18, 2023 @06:03AM (#38318053)
It's not a problem for me. It's good that I can detect chatGPT by this sign.
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by daveguy on Saturday November 18, 2023 @06:24PM (#38325979)
It doesn't become smarter except for releases of new models. It's an inference engine.
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by peignoir on Saturday November 18, 2023 @07:25AM (#38318757)
I read an article where they did a proper Turing test and it seems people recognize it was a machine answering because it made no writing errors and wrote perfectly
Re:OpenAI announces leadership transition by ben_w on Saturday November 18, 2023 @07:40AM (#38318885)
I've not read that, but I do remember hearing that the first human to fail the Turing test did so because they seemed to know far too much minutiae about Star Trek.