Re:Canonical Launches MicroCloud to Deploy Your Own "Fully F...
by Scubabear68 on Friday November 17, 2023 @01:40PM
(#38307967)
What are the implications of the AGPL license for this (if any)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Canonical Launches MicroCloud to Deploy Your Own "Fully F...
by oopsthrowpass on Friday November 17, 2023 @02:04PM
(#38308360)
my understanding is that you can't sell this cloud as a service (AWS would not be able to use it)
Re:Canonical Launches MicroCloud to Deploy Your Own "Fully F...
by count on Saturday November 18, 2023 @09:14AM
(#38319819)
Sure they can, they just have to make the code available that is in what they deploy.
Re:Canonical Launches MicroCloud to Deploy Your Own "Fully F...
by meonkeys on Friday November 17, 2023 @03:22PM
(#38309495)
It means all derivative works of microcloud must also be licensed AGPL (if someone else "links" other software into it, makes modifications and re-distributes, they must provide those modifications, etc).
Any company can sell microcloud, but it must remain AGPL.
This license choice is a defense against microcloud being assimilated into proprietary products.
(Now I'll guess at the motivation of your original question. Lemme know if I missed your point...) The AGPL doesn't apply to any containers or VMs running in a microcloud any more than Ubuntu's licensing applies to programs you run on Ubuntu.