Re:The Lack of Compensation in Open Source Software Is Unsus...
by teddyh on Friday November 17, 2023 @01:26PM
(#38307741)
At best, that only covers bug fixes. And, as I said, bug fixes are usually implied to be available in future releases.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Lack of Compensation in Open Source Software Is Unsus...
by andrewjl on Friday November 17, 2023 @03:43PM
(#38309931)
> At best, that only covers bug fixes. And, as I said, bug fixes are usually implied to be available in future releases
Can you explain how you got to that interpretation from that phrasing?
> SHOULD THE PROGRAM PROVE DEFECTIVE, YOU ASSUME THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY SERVICING, REPAIR OR CORRECTION.
And how is future development and / or support not covered under servicing of that clause?
Re:The Lack of Compensation in Open Source Software Is Unsus...
by teddyh on Friday November 17, 2023 @03:55PM
(#38310165)
Fixing defects is a different activity from support and future development, no?
Re:The Lack of Compensation in Open Source Software Is Unsus...
by andrewjl on Friday November 17, 2023 @08:42PM
(#38313802)
Why is that distinction important? Especially in light of the first sentence of the paragraph that sentence is embedded in.
> THERE IS NO WARRANTY FOR THE PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW.