Re:Unauthorized "David Attenborough" AI clone narrates devel...
by vbeeaz on Friday November 17, 2023 @07:48AM
(#38302779)
It is ambiguous because it makes it sound like we are talking legality here, but there's nothing illegal about making a project like this if you do not profit from it. Therefore, it is a weasel word.
Re:Unauthorized "David Attenborough" AI clone narrates devel...
by BSDobelix on Friday November 17, 2023 @07:57AM
(#38302858)
I think you're right, as long as it's clearly labelled as AI-generated.
Re:Unauthorized "David Attenborough" AI clone narrates devel...
by thaumasiotes on Friday November 17, 2023 @07:58AM
(#38302869)
What? It means nothing of the kind.
Have you never heard about unauthorized biographies?
Is not a weasel word. There is nothing unambiguous about it.
> it implies that it should be necessary for the developer to ask David Attenborough for authorization
Yes. It does. Now you might disagree with that, but it perfectly unambiguously means that.