News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by tetromino_ on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @04:47PM (#38283028)
Well, having the plane crash and catch on fire upon attempt at landing would have been substantially worse for the environment.
Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by killingtime74 on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @08:59PM (#38285058)
Of course it's true its better than crashing. It's just if we go up the chain of events perhaps better restraints or a checklist could have prevented this altogether. I wonder if they do post-mortems in logistics
Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by psunavy03 on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @09:15PM (#38285157)
"I wonder if aviators do post-flight debriefs." Good gravy. This is like your nontechnical relative saying "my cousin is good with computers; how hard can programming be?"
Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by killingtime74 on Thursday November 16, 2023 @12:20AM (#38286028)
What about the cargo loaders? Unless you think the pilots loaded the horses?
Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by psunavy03 on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:02AM (#38286251)
Sigh . . . Donny, you're out of your element.

Once they sign for the aircraft, the pilot in command is legally responsible for all aspects of safe aircraft operation regardless of who did what work before.

Re:Plane forced to turn back to JFK after horse breaks loose... by halfsquatch on Thursday November 16, 2023 @01:21AM (#38286316)
That's just, like, your opinion, man.