News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Use Timestamps by Veserv on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @06:02AM (#38275426)
You can just use ISO 8601, YYYY-MM-DD, then you can be international standards compliant as well.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601

Re:Use Timestamps by jankremer on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @06:34AM (#38275622)
I think everyone should use ISO 8601.

And if you are using something else, especially if it’s something like XX-XX-XX, specify what you mean by that!

Re:Use Timestamps by account42 on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @07:59AM (#38276177)
I prefer RFC3339, specifically:

> NOTE: ISO 8601 defines date and time separated by "T". Applications using this syntax may choose, for the sake of readability, to specify a full-date and full-time separated by (say) a space character.

Re:Use Timestamps by sverhagen on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @06:11AM (#38275476)
I have a hard time getting that past non-technical users (in the US). People that don't think like an engineer. Even though we're right! Of course!
Re:Use Timestamps by readthenotes1 on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @06:18AM (#38275518)
Plus, it sorts naturally.

Starting with the day or the month is Ludacris.

Re:Use Timestamps by rekoil on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @06:30AM (#38275582)
Day I can accept, even if I dislike it. Starting with the month will always make me angry. It just has no logic to it.
Re:Use Timestamps by alanbernstein on Wednesday November 15, 2023 @10:16AM (#38277511)
Sure it does. It's the shortest way to specify a date within a period of a year surrounding the current day... Which means it's a date format that should only ever be spoken, not committed to written record.
Re:Use Timestamps by actionfromafar on Friday November 17, 2023 @04:46AM (#38301430)
Month first is not even syntactically correct, even in spoken form, in some languages.